Regular readers will know that I am no fan of Boris Johnson,
having been critical of his actions over the past three years. Johnson has a
long history of lying when it suits his interests (here for a list of issues
which renders him sufficiently untrustworthy to take his public pronouncements
at face value).
Brexit has brought out the worst in him: Remember the weekly savings of £350
million splashed all over the side of that bus? Or what about the fact
that he constantly undermined his prime
minister whilst sitting in her cabinet?
Despite all of this – or perhaps because of it – I have been
of the view that Johnson does not want a no-deal Brexit. Even last week’s
execrable decision to prorogue parliament could be justified as an attempt to
put pressure on MPs to sign up to the much derided Withdrawal Agreement. As I
pointed out in my last post, one interpretation of the strategy was to ensure
that it was impossible to reach a deal with the EU so as to put pressure on MPs
to ratify the Withdrawal Agreement and dare Labour to block it, knowing that
they could be blamed for a no-deal Brexit in any subsequent election. I still
think that is a plausible strategy.
But over the weekend, it has become evident
that the government is prepared to trample over democratic norms to an extent
that was previously unthinkable. We had the unedifying spectacle of Michael Gove refusing to commit the government to complying with any laws passed by parliament.
This was followed up by the threat to deselect any Conservative MP who votes
against the government in order to block a no-deal Brexit. I do not want to
describe what is happening as a coup – a word which has been bandied around a
lot recently – but there is a new strain of authoritarianism in British
politics, the likes of which we have not seen before (at least in peacetime). This
is not the Conservative Party of Margaret Thatcher or Winston Churchill
(Johnson’s political hero).
The sheer hypocrisy of the deselection policy beggars
belief. As Tory MP Alistair Burt pointed out in response to the government’s call for MPs to support its Brexit
policy, “I did. I voted for the
conclusions of the negotiations brought to Parliament in the WA [Withdrawal
Agreement]. JRM [Jacob Rees-Mogg], his friends and current Cabinet members did
not. Why am I, having loyally supported, now being threatened and not them?”
It is hard to dispute the logic of this claim. On 15 January, 118 Conservative
MPs voted against the government’s stated policy of ratifying the Withdrawal
Agreement. On 12 March this number was reduced to 75 and by the time of the
final vote on 29 March there were still 34 recidivists. The 196 Tory MPs who
voted with the government on three occasions will not be inclined to be
threatened by those who have consistently showed a lack of loyalty to the
former prime minister. What comes around goes around, and Johnson’s lack of
loyalty in the past means he cannot count on the support of those who he has
previously let down.
Nor does the deselection tactic make a lot of immediate
sense. The government has a majority of one: withdrawing the whip from
Conservative MPs means that they are effectively excommunicated from the party,
increasing the likelihood that they will vote against the government on a range
of other issues. But if the ultimate objective is to hold an election sooner
rather than later, there may be some method to the madness – why else would a
government want to operate without a working majority? As David Gauke MP said
in a radio interview this morning, “I
think their strategy, to be honest, is to lose [an attempt to rule out a
no-deal Brexit] this week and seek a general election having removed those of
us who are not against Brexit or leaving the EU but believe we should do so
with a deal.” Indeed, newspapers this afternoon were full of headlines
suggesting that Johnson would be prepared to trigger an election if he lost a
vote ruling out a no-deal Brexit. However, an election can only occur if the
government loses a vote of no confidence in parliament or if two-thirds of MPs vote
for it. Either way, it will require the consent of Labour MPs.
Former PM Tony Blair has warned Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn
against falling into the “elephant trap” of calling for an election. Blair’s
words should be heeded. As much as people are opposed to Brexit and the way in
which Johnson has ridden roughshod over the British constitution, there is no
guarantee that voters will flock to Corbyn as an alternative. In fact, I am
pretty sure they won’t. Obviously Corbyn does not see it that way but I would
be prepared to bet that he will not improve on the relative success of the 2017
election result.
If Corbyn really wants to put pressure on Johnson, his
strategy should be to get as many Tory rebels as possible to sign up to a
motion which commits parliament to ruling out a no-deal Brexit, whilst refusing
to rise to the bait of any vote which would trigger a general election. This
has the disadvantage that if Brexit can be delivered without collapsing the
economy it will hand Johnson an electoral boost. But a more likely outcome is
that since the EU will not cave in on the Irish backstop, which the hardliners
in the Conservative Party will not be able to accept, a disciplined Labour
Party can hold the Tories’ feet to the flames for a much longer period and
possibly even force the party to split which would be to Labour’s electoral
advantage.
Unfortunately, this would mean a continuation of the
political wrangling that has characterised the last twelve months – and that is
definitely not in the electorate’s interest. But an election is not in the
country’s interest either. The Fixed-term Parliaments Act of 2011 was designed
to prevent governments controlling the timing of elections for their own
purposes (which it spectacularly failed to do in 2017). If the terms of the Act
had been adhered to, we would not have had an election since 2015 and would not
have to face the prospect of another one until summer 2020. The 2017 election
was a device to suit the government’s convenience – as will any plebiscite in
2019. If there is another election this year, it will further undermine the
claim that a second EU referendum would be to disrespect the “will of the
people.”
Is there a way out of this political nightmare? It is hard
to see one. We are paying the price for a litany of past mistakes – from the
decision to hold a referendum at all; to drawing red lines around membership of
the single market and customs union, to Johnson’s plan to resolve the issue by
31 October. Whatever happens now, half
the electorate will be left disaffected and angry. There are no good options –
only bad ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment