There is an increasing sense that many of those people who promoted
the Brexit cause last year are beginning to back away from their position. Two
days ago I reported the comments by the director of the Vote Leave campaign who
suggested that leaving the EU might turn out to be an “error.”
One of the few economists to support Brexit, Andrew Lilico, noted yesterday on Twitter
that “I'm much more pessimistic about Brexit myself since the General Election.It's the Election that changed that.”
My response to that is that the election only changes the tactics of the negotiations
but the strategy of Brexit itself was – and is – misguided. Finally, Treasury
officials are said to have written an unpublished paper challenging the
Department for International Trade to prove it can line up free-trade
agreements with non-EU countries that can outweigh the loss of European trade
associated with leaving the customs union.
Frankly, it is all beginning to look like the car crash which
I warned it would be all along. Far too many of those responsible for setting
the Brexit bonfire alight in the first place departed the scene pretty quickly
when they realised the magnitude of the task ahead. Nigel Farage has resorted
to his role as a sniper from the sidelines; Boris Johnson and Michael Gove backed
out of their prime ministerial challenges when it became evident that neither
of them was likely to win and David Cameron (at whose door much of the blame
should be laid) lectures the government about austerity from his well-paid
position on the international lecture circuit. The fact that apart from David
Davis, nobody in government appears willing to take ownership of Brexit, speaks
volumes. It is hard to believe that nobody in government did not see any of
this coming – the economics profession warned long and loud – but given the
apparent level of disorganisation within government and the civil service, you
do have to wonder.
With the Article 50 clock ticking and no indication of
progress on the things which matter to business, they are increasingly having
to make their own arrangements. The financial services industry in particular
is not going to wait around for government to make a decision. It looks
increasingly likely that the passporting arrangements which allow EU banks to
conduct cross border business, will be a casualty of the UK decision to
withdraw from the Single Market. Foreign banks operating in London will in
effect be treated as third country institutions and thus have to apply for a
banking licence to continue operations.
It takes up to 12 months to go through the application process for a banking licence, and around six
months to conduct the preparatory work. The head of the Financial Conduct Authority
today called on the government to clarify before year-end what form of transitional
arrangements will be put in place to allow financial services to continue
operating. But it really does need to act fast: On the basis that the UK will
leave the EU in March 2019, as things currently stand this means that banks will
have to begin their preparations this autumn.
Many banks are simply not going to wait around. Deutsche
Bank is reported to be ready to relocate many of the banking books currently operated
out of London back to Frankfurt, and they are not alone. Three Japanese
institutions, Daiwa, Nomura and Sumitomo, are applying for licences to operate
businesses in Frankfurt and some big US institutions are reported to be raising
their German headcount. This is the business end of Brexit – jobs which might
otherwise have remained in London will be transferred elsewhere. Banks, in
particular, could find themselves on Brexit day unable to conduct business in
the EU if they do not make plans now.
Whilst at present the numbers discussed publicly are small,
the concern is that this could mark the thin end of a bigger wedge. The City of
London contributed 11.5% of total government tax receipts in fiscal 2015-16,
and business not conducted in London and jobs transferred elsewhere represents
tax revenue which does not flow into the UK government’s coffers. In Philip Hammond’s
words, voters did not vote to make themselves poorer by backing Brexit. But at
a time when the government is under pressure to ease back on austerity, allowing high value added
business to slip away because government cannot get its act together will end
up doing just that.
No comments:
Post a Comment