We have just finished the fifth full trading week of the
year, yet it seems an awful lot has been packed into the past 25 sessions. We
started with the assassination of Qasem Soleimani which spooked markets –
albeit only briefly – and followed this up with the accidental shooting down of
a Ukrainian aircraft in Tehran which further inflamed Middle Eastern tensions.
The current big source of concern is the coronavirus which prompted a market
sell-off last week but which has subsequently been reversed. Add to this the
bizarre spectacle of the Trump impeachment, his subsequent acquittal and the
travails of the Democrats in Iowa and you have all the ingredients for a
classic risk-off market.
But not a bit of it. The US equity market reached an
all-time high on Thursday, taking the year-to-date gain on the S&P500 to
2.7%. If it carries on at this rate (which it won’t) we are on track for
another 20%-plus gain following last year’s 29% increase. Whilst market
measures of implied option volatility are off their recent lows reported at the
end of last year, they remain far from elevated (chart above). The VIX measure
of equity volatility currently trades at 15.6 versus a long-term average of
19.1. A similar picture is evident in the fixed income market where the MOVE
index ended the week at 61.2 against a long-term average of 92.7. Despite the
recent increases, the extent to which investors have expressed their concerns
about the long-term economic effects of the coronavirus suggests that recent
moves look fairly muted in a wider context
Markets have thus looked through the recent concerns and
appear to have concluded that the only thing they have to fear is fear itself.
To the extent that the initial reaction reflected fear of the unknown, selling
was a natural response but now the shock has worn off. However, it feels like
the recent equity surge reflects nothing more than a relief rally. And relief
rallies can run out of steam. After all, we have no idea what the near-term
implications will be for the Chinese economy but it is unlikely to be good for
corporate earnings. Reports from China point to significantly reduced activity
as people stay at home, either by choice or as a result of state directive.
Burberry has already warned about the potential hit to earnings and has closed
24 of its 64 shops on the mainland whilst ripping up its earnings guidance for the current fiscal year. They are
unlikely to be alone as companies with significant exposure to the Chinese
economy begin to assess the damage (other luxury goods producers and airlines are
sectors which spring immediately to mind). Meanwhile, supply chain disruptions
might well become more pronounced and as the hit to corporate earnings
materialises, so markets will be forced to revise their expectations.
That said, if the situation mirrors the SARS outbreak in
2003, markets will be expecting a big rebound in activity in the second half of
the year with the result that they may simply be looking through the
(hopefully) short-term disruption. But we cannot be sure what will happen.
Consequently it would seem prudent for investors to take some risk off the
table. The fact that they are not doing so reflects the great faith they have
in central banks to keep markets afloat with exceptionally lax monetary policy.
The rational economist in me does not share that optimism, but viewed from the
perspective of the market, the absence of decent financial investment
alternatives suggests that any market correction is likely to be brief. If you
are a forward looking rational investor, this is a good reason to stay in the
market because you avoid the transaction costs associated with selling and
buying back in again.
Having been burned in the past with regard to calling the
market top I am reluctant to do so again. But a market where valuations look
stretched is always going to be vulnerable to unexpected exogenous shocks and
it may be that the coronavirus effect turns out to be the catalyst for a
rethink. Even if it doesn’t – and there are good reasons to believe that much
of the current concern is overblown – it should act as a warning sign that good
times do not last forever. So far, the fact that the US economy is holding up
continues to support the bullish case and although I do not believe that the
economy will crack this year, it may pay to dance near the door in order to
beat the rush if the stampede begins.
If ever an indication were needed that something is afoot,
take a look at the rally in Tesla stock. Investors have shorted it for the last
year, believing the company would struggle to deliver on its plans. Yet since
the start of the year its price has risen by around 80% and its market cap now
exceeds that of Volkswagen (chart above). Such a sea change reflects more than a
simple shift in attitude towards electric cars and Tesla’s ability to deliver –
that is a bubble waiting to pop. My natural investor caution is based on the
premise that if something cannot continue to forever, it will stop. There again,
maybe this time really is different. But they said that in 2000 and 2007 as
well. Caveat emptor!
No comments:
Post a Comment